Decision-maker
MI
Hon. Marci Ien
Minister for Women & Gender Equality
- Party
- Liberal
- Riding
- Eglinton—Lawrence
- Jurisdiction
- Federal · House of Commons
Contactmarci.ien@parl.gc.ca
On this page
Voting recordWhere They StandWho's lobbyingTimeline
Politician intelligence · the Canadian way
Know who decides.
Open a decision-maker and Clarion assembles their whole public record in one room: how they voted on the floor of the House, where the evidence puts them on the issues you work, which organizations already have their ear, the email to reach them, and a dated timeline of everything they've done. One official, the full picture — lobbying fused in, every line cited.
Honesty first: the voting record is federal recorded divisions only, and we surface independence signals — never an inferred stance. “Where They Stand” is recorded votes grouped by issue, with the receipts. We don’t synthesize a position from a vote, and we don’t pretend to.
What's in the room
Everything on one decision-maker, on one screen.
A decision-maker's page isn't a bio — it's a working file. Clarion pulls every dated record keyed to one official into a single, cited view, so the first thing you see is who they are, who already has their ear, and how to reach them.
- The role, party, and riding — and a public contact email where one exists.
- A federal voting record from the House of Commons recorded divisions.
- “Where They Stand” — their recorded votes grouped by the issues you work.
- Every organization whose lobbying reports name them, by meeting count.
Decision-maker
MI
Hon. Marci Ien
Minister for Women & Gender Equality
- Party
- Liberal
- Riding
- Eglinton—Lawrence
- Jurisdiction
- Federal · House of Commons
Contactmarci.ien@parl.gc.ca
On this page
Voting recordWhere They StandWho's lobbyingTimeline
The fused record, surface by surface
A voting record, a stance read, and a lobbying ledger — fused.
Incumbents give you a profile. Clarion fuses the legislative record with the lobbying registries on the same page, so you see not just how an official votes, but who is already in the room with them.
01Voting record
How they voted, read honestly.
Federal recorded divisions, led by an independence read instead of a naïve tally. Under Canada's strong party discipline most votes follow the caucus, so we tag the signal that matters — free votes, breaking ranks, House interventions — and never read personal conviction into a whipped vote.
Voting record · recorded divisionsVotes the party line
- 248
- Recorded votes
- 97%
- With the caucus
- 4
- Broke ranks
- YeaC-27
Consumer Privacy Protection Act — second reading
- NayC-63Broke ranks
Online Harms Act — report stage amendment
- YeaC-352Free vote
Affordability measures — third reading
Federal House of Commons recorded divisions only. Strong party discipline means most votes follow the caucus — we surface independence signals, never an inferred stance.
02Where They Stand
The evidence on an issue — you draw the conclusion.
Their recorded votes grouped by policy issue, each with the same independence read and the receipts behind it. It is cited evidence on the record, never an inferred position — we never synthesize a stance from a vote, and we say so on the tile.
By issue
Privacy & data12Affordability9Climate7Health5
Privacy & dataSome independent signal
Recorded votes grouped by issue, with the independence read. Positions are never inferred — you draw the conclusion.
See the receipts →
03Who's lobbying them
See who already has their ear.
The organizations whose lobbying communication reports name this official, ranked by meeting count and recency — straight from the public registries. This is the fusion incumbents miss: the lobbying ledger sitting on the politician's own page.
Who's lobbying this officialn=5
Council of Canadian Innovators
7 meetings· May 2026Shopify
5 meetings· Apr 2026TELUS
4 meetings· Apr 2026Canadian Chamber of Commerce
3 meetings· Mar 2026Microsoft Canada
2 meetings· Feb 2026
Matched by name to the registries' designated-public-office-holder records — meetings as the lobbyists filed them.
04Activity timeline
Everything they've done, newest first.
Votes, sponsored bills, lobbying contacts received, and Hansard interventions in one chronological, cited feed — so you can brief on a decision-maker from a single screen instead of reconstructing their week across five sources.
- Broke ranks on C-63Broke ranksJun 4
Online Harms Act — report stage amendment
- Met with ShopifyMay 28
On digital innovation & privacy reform
- Sponsored Bill C-352May 12
An Act respecting affordability measures
- Spoke in the HouseMay 6
Government Orders — privacy & competition
Everything on the public record — votes, sponsored bills, lobbying contacts received, Hansard — in one cited timeline.
- High
Broke ranks on C-63 report-stage amendment
Vote · 2h ago · recorded division
- High
Council of Canadian Innovators filed a new meeting
Lobbying · today · names this official
- Med
Sponsored bill C-352 reported back from committee
Bill · yesterday · matched by name
From the room, your next move
Reach them, and watch what moves.
The room isn't just a record — it's where the work starts. The contact email is on the page where one is public, and the same matching that built the file keeps it current, so the change on a decision-maker you follow lands in your digest dated and graded.
→A whipped vote where they broke ranks, a new registration naming them, a bill they sponsored reported back — each matched to the official, each cited to the record.
Why it matters
Walk in knowing the room before you're in it.
A GR brief that names how an official actually votes, who already lobbies them, and how to reach them beats a bio every time someone senior asks where the votes are.
Map the room01
Know who's already inside.
Before you book the meeting, see which organizations have already filed time with the official — so you walk in knowing whether you're opening a door or joining a coalition.
Brief with receipts02
Cite the record, not a hunch.
Every line on the page links to its source — the division, the registration, the bill. Brief a client with evidence they can verify, not a confident guess about where a member stands.
Stay honest03
Defend every claim you make.
Because we never infer a position from a vote, what you carry into the room is defensible. An independence read and a cited ledger survive the question “how do you know?” — a synthesized stance doesn't.
Open a decision-maker's room.
Start free and open any official — the voting record, the issue-stance rollup, the lobbying ledger, the contact, and the timeline are on the screen. No demo gate to see how the record is fused.